Cutting Emissions from Transportation

The transportation sector is the second largest source of U.S. GHG emissions, responsible for 28% of emissions nationally, and nearly 40% in Northeast and Mid-Atlantic states. Transportation fuels, notably gasoline and diesel, must be priced in a way that reflects the cost of these emissions, either through a carbon tax or the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), which currently regulates power plant emissions.

Acadia Center is working to change policies so they account for the full lifecycle of the greenhouse gas emissions fuels produce. Gasoline refined from tar sands, for example, has very high extraction emissions. Several different policies could address these upstream emissions, such as the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) program in California. The LCFS sets targets for lowering the lifecycle carbon intensity of fuels and allows the market to determine the most cost-effective fuels and strategies for achieving those targets. A good initial step would be to require tracking and reporting by oil importers and wholesalers to allow states to determine how their fuel supplies are changing and what the best policy answer is.

Electrification

Acadia Center is also advancing solutions to help reduce the upfront cost of electric vehicles (EVs), build out charging infrastructure and educate consumers on the benefits of EVs. It is possible to dramatically increase the adoption of EVs over the next few years.

Electrification of the vehicle fleet is one of the key pathways to cleaning up the transportation sector. Switching from a traditional car burning gasoline to a fully electric vehicle can reduce GHG emissions by 60% in the Northeast. As cleaner sources power the electric grid, these benefits will increase. In addition, vehicles running on electricity don’t emit any of the local pollutants that come from gas engines.

EVs save money, too. Switching from gasoline to electricity can cut per-mile costs significantly and allow consumers to spend more of their hard-earned dollars in local economies. Time-of-use rates will allow EV owners to save even more money by charging at night when the cost of generating electricity is low.

To seize the opportunity of EVs, the top priorities are to explore and address potential impacts on the power grid and maximize the ability of EVs to serve as a grid resource.

 

  • CT RGGI Leadership Gov. Cover

    Connecticut Leadership Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative Letter

    Twenty three business, environmental, consumer, public health, agricultural, and academic organizations wrote to encourage Governor Malloy to show bold leadership by utilizing the effective Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) to put Connecticut on a path to achieving the state’s Global Warming Solutions Act (Public Act 08-98) requirements, both by strengthening the existing program and by pursuing steps to add the transportation sector to RGGI.

  • The Future of RGGI's Revenue in CT_Cover

    Clean Energy Investments at Stake in Connecticut

    Connecticut's General Assembly has proposed taking $20 million of Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) revenue away from clean energy investments. Acadia Center looked into what that would mean for the state and found, among other things, that it would cost consumers approximately $60 million.

  • MA Electricity Rates Doc Cover

    Massachusetts’ Electricity Rates: Review of National Grid’s Proposed Changes

    National Grid is proposing significant distribution rate increases and two major changes to rate design in Massachusetts that would
    seriously impact residential ratepayers, small businesses, and a significant category of solar projects. Acadia Center's Mark LeBel gives a summary and review of these prospective changes.

  • View all related resources