DPU Halts Gas Line Extension Subsidies, Saving Customers Millions. This victory is a good example of how coordinated advocacy, grounded in data analysis, can shape precedent-setting regulatory outcomes. In April of this year, Acadia Center and Rewiring America co-authored group coalition comments that were generally supportive of the draft gas line extension policy but also contained specific recommendations for how to make the policy stronger. For example, the draft policy mentioned exception criteria projects would need to meet to receive a line extension subsidy, including one criterion describing how the project must have “….no feasible alternatives to the use of natural gas, including electrification.” In its comments, Acadia Center argued “feasibility” should be defined as “technical feasibility” (a subtle yet crucial distinction), and the DPU agreed with us in their final decision, limiting allowances to projects that could prove there was no technically feasible alternative to natural gas in their specific building. How do we know Acadia Center helped shape the outcome? Our letter was cited 18 times throughout the DPU’s decision.
Acadia Center, in coordination with other advocacy organizations in Maine, has been active in encouraging the Maine PUC to undertake a "Future of Gas" investigation in Maine. This effort culminated in a meeting between advocates and Maine PUC Commissioners in January 2025, where the Maine PUC announced that they would open an inquiry later in 2025 to evaluate how natural gas distribution system planning aligns with Maine's overarching climate goals.