Gas bills on the rise as temperatures drop for fall 2025-winter 2026

Winter will soon be here, and so too could higher heating bill for many across Massachusetts. Here’s how much they’re expected to spike going into 2026.

Policy Advocate Noah Berman, discussing cost cutting regulatory suggestions,

“When the pipes are at the end of their useful life instead of putting in a new gas system is to start to electrify those customers instead.”

To watch the full interview from NBC Boston, click here.

Cuts to Rhode Island energy-efficiency plan bad for residents, study says

To read the full article from Canary Media, click here.

‘Status quo roadmap’: Critics say new RI transportation plan fails climate, transit goals

Rhode Island planners have approved a new version of the state’s 10-year transportation funding plan over objections that it is too focused on automobiles and will not do enough to meet the state’s climate goals.

The State Transportation Improvement Plan for 2026-2025 lays out $11.5 billion worth of spending over that period, including construction, maintenance, highways, streets, sidewalks, bridges, buses and ferries.

Despite his big-picture opposition, Wolf said positive projects in the new 10-year plan included the Kingston Station Mobility Hub, Westerly Train Station platform upgrades, Mount Hope Bay Greenway and Wakefield Main Street improvements.

Grow Smart RI is part of a dozen-group coalition, including the Acadia Center, Save RIPTA and the Conservation Law Foundation, that wrote with a series of requests to the Planning Council including:

• A detailed account of how the state DOT plans to reduce carbon emissions and take steps to reduce driving instead of relying on a transition to electric cars
• A separate plan section on how the state intends to execute the Transit Master Plan
• Shift some flexible federal transportation funding toward RIPTA
• Put funding behind plans to electrify the MBTA’s Providence Line
• Build dedicated bus lanes on existing highway lanes and include a carpool lane on the new westbound Washington Bridge.

To read the full article from the Providence Journal, click here.

New Hampshire has never been a trailblazer on solar, but clean energy proponents still see a path

New Hampshire has been slower than the rest of New England to lean into renewable electricity generation, including through solar power. And while some opportunities to change that will likely arise during the upcoming legislative session, it’s not yet clear whether lawmakers will have an appetite to pursue them.

This principle was particularly visible in New England this June, when a buffer from behind-the-meter solar — meaning arrays installed at the site of use, such as residential rooftop panels — saved consumers an estimated $8.2 million in peak electricity pricing on one particularly hot day, according to a report by renewable energy advocacy nonprofit The Acadia Center.

To read the full article from the New Hampshire Bulletin, click here.

Anti-Renewable Policies Will Cost Ratepayers

The Mad King’s fever dream of energy dominance is designed to reward the fossil fuel industry and punish renewable energy. It will prove costly to both ratepayers and public health.

It’s also doomed to fail, according to energy economics experts.

Jamie Dickerson, senior director of climate and clean energy programs at the Acadia Center, said the actions taken by the regime to halt offshore wind projects and port infrastructure along the East Coast will “increase utility bills for families and businesses by hundreds of millions of dollars annually, jeopardize reliable power, and kill thousands of good-paying, union jobs.”

Dickerson noted these stoppages and withdrawn funding will make energy systems more vulnerable to extreme weather, weaken federal-state energy system planning and collaboration, and erode investor confidence and market stability that will, like the IEEFA said, undermine future investment in needed grid infrastructure.

“From any point of view, halting work on established wind projects that states energy officials are relying on to meet power needs, clean the air, and reduce system costs defies the facts and simply makes no sense,” Dickerson said.

To read the full article from ecoRI, click here.

CT, RI sue over federal offshore wind work orders

Connecticut and Rhode Island are suing the Trump administration over orders to halt work on offshore wind developments.

The federal orders demand work cease on Revolution Wind, located off the Rhode Island coast. It is expected to power 350,000 New England homes and if construction continues unabated, it would be operational by next year.

Jamie Dickerson, senior director of climate and clean energy programs at the Acadia Center, said the work stoppage could raise consumer costs.

“The projects, as they were supposed to come online, would have substantially hedged the region against those volatile winter fuel costs,” Dickerson explained. “Because the offshore wind contracts are at a fixed price, it reduced the amount the region would otherwise have to pay for more expensive fossil fuels.”

A new study showed offshore wind has the potential to save New England residents $400 million a year in energy costs. It comes as Connecticut has the third-highest electricity costs nationwide. The federal action also halts grants for ports to be developed into offshore wind ports. Bridgeport will lose a $10.5 million grant allocated in 2022 for the construction of an operations, maintenance and wind facility.

The effects of the federal order go beyond ratepayers’ cost, affecting state economies as well. Connecticut and Rhode Island saw an additional 1,200 jobs from the Revolution Wind project. Dickerson pointed out not just about the jobs at the port but indirect jobs stemming from the burgeoning industry.

“The fishermen and the mariners, and the navigators who have been benefiting from the ripple effect investments of these offshore wind project developments, shuttling workers to and from ports to the staging facilities and the vessels offshore,” Dickerson outlined.

Studies have shown Connecticut has significant potential for being a hub for the offshore wind supply chain. Aside from the federal challenges, the state has shown some wavering commitment to clean energy. Gov. Ned Lamont pulled Connecticut from a multistate offshore wind deal last year and a natural gas pipeline expansion is being given preliminary approval.

To read the full article from Public News Service, click here.

Editorial: Healey concedes natural gas’ key role in energy mix

When it comes to energy supplies, the corner office — at least for the time being — has chosen economic pragmatism over ideology.

Gov. Maura Healey signaled that shift by expressing her support for Eversource Energy’s proposal to lock in more natural gas for Massachusetts, a sign that at least one official in her administration sees fossil fuel continuing as an integral component of the state’s energy mix.

Nonetheless environmental advocates said regulators should carefully weigh whether more gas infrastructure is warranted.

“Acadia Center is reviewing the proposed pipeline expansion project, which responds to the task given to gas utilities by the DPU to phase-out reliance on Everett Marine Terminal,” the group said in a statement.

“Phasing-out reliance on EMT should be done first with all available clean energy solutions, rather than with expanded gas pipeline supply.”

To read the full article from the Lowell Sun, click here.

Revolution Wind developer sues Trump administration over stop-work order

Less than two weeks after the Trump administration issued a stop-work order for Revolution Wind — a large and nearly complete wind farm off the coasts of Massachusetts and Rhode Island — the company behind the project, is pushing back.

Ørsted, one of the largest offshore wind developers in the world, sued the administration in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on Thursday. In its complaint, the company called the stop work order “unlawful,” claiming it “lacks any evidentiary basis” and was issued “without statutory authority.”

“We didn’t believe these actions taken by the president were lawful, and I’m really glad to see Ørsted pushing back heavily,” said Kyle Murray, Massachusetts program director at the Acadia Center, a clean energy research and advocacy nonprofit. “Hopefully this lawsuit will prevail.”

To read the full article from wbur, click here.

CT’s Latest Climate Report Shows Emissions in 2023 Decreased in the Two Largest Sources of Climate Pollution: Transportation and Buildings

(HARTFORD) — The Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (“DEEP”) published its latest Greenhouse Gas (“GHG”) Emissions Inventory, a comprehensive documentation of Connecticut’s air pollution that contributes to climate change. DEEP has issued this report since 2003, and also now in accordance with Public Act 25-125, signed into law by Governor Lamont earlier this month.

“Connecticut deserves credit for tracking emissions as the state works to meet clear, scientifically driven goals to reduce climate pollution” said Daniel Sosland, president of Acadia Center. “Acadia Center thanks DEEP for making emissions information publicly available, allowing the state and stakeholders to see where progress is being made and better adjust to challenges in the effort to build a clean energy economy. Addressing climate is essential to positioning Connecticut for a stronger economic future, reducing energy costs, and making needed improvements in housing and transportation that will improve the quality of life in its communities.”

To read the full article from the Connecticut Department of Energy & Environmental Protection, click here.

Healey backs natural gas transmission project

STATE HOUSE, BOSTON, SEPT. 3, 2025…..Gov. Maura Healey signaled support for Eversource’s proposal to lock in more natural gas for Massachusetts, offering an indication she sees the fossil fuel as an important part of the state’s energy mix even as her administration presses forward with longer-term climate goals.

Environmental advocates said regulators should carefully weigh whether more gas infrastructure is the right path. “Acadia Center is reviewing the proposed pipeline expansion project, which responds to the task given to gas utilities by the DPU to phase-out reliance on Everett Marine Terminal,” the group said in a statement.

“Phasing-out reliance on EMT should be done first with all available clean energy solutions, rather than with expanded gas pipeline supply.” The group also cautioned against long-term risks to consumers. “By doubling down on gas, Massachusetts and the region risk locking consumers into deeper and more expensive fuel cost exposure that will keep ratepayers paying higher bills for decades longer,” Acadia Center said.

To read the full article from State House News, click here.